Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Sunday, February 23

A Christmas Carol – Birmingham Rep

Vanity publishing, which in recent years has metamorphosed into the far more respectable “self-publishing”, was once a much frowned upon indulgence reserved for potty poets and rich romantic novelists who didn’t need to make any money. However, it seems a number of well-known titles emerged from the self-funding route – “Paradise Lost”, “Sense and Sensibility”, “The Tale of Peter Rabbit” and Charles Dickens himself wasn’t beyond dipping into his pocket and splurging a few shillings to get a book on the shelves. His investment in A Christmas Carol would make many modern day self-publishers jealous – having never been out of print since 1843.

Scrooge must be one of the most portrayed characters on stage and screen after Sherlock Holmes and Jesus and has been played by all and sundry. The tale has ascended to the level of a folk story and woven itself so completely into our cultural DNA – including a stunning version which ran at the Royal Shakespeare Company penned by Birmingham’s own, David Edgar.

The Birmingham Rep have opted for Mark Gatis’s version starring Matthew Cottle as Scrooge’s latest incarnation and Rufus Hound as Jacob Marley. With all the Rep resources and reputation, it’s a shame something more juicy hasn’t emerged. The story intact is given us without surprises or invention, Scrooge himself seems just a bit grumpy rather than a vituperative taskmaster deserving of a lesson.

Rufus Hound is haunting as Marley but underused for the remainder of the play. The ensemble cast (some of whom quadrupled roles) weren’t given enough chance to explore the vast Dickensian landscape of characters and gave dependable, if not inspired, performances. Lance West tripled as Fred, Young Scrooge and Peter Cratchit. Ryan Weston doubled as not-so-Tiny Tim and Young Marley. Ghosts were manifested by the towering Mark Theodore as the Present and the uncanny, other worldly Grace Hogg-Robinson with a spiky physicality as Past. Geoffrey Beevers seems to tap closest to a Dickensian-vibe and his narrator added a nice, original twist at the end.

If you’ve never seen or heard go Christmas Carol this is a great introduction, the story trips along, there are simple dances and songs, and the special effects are fine. And despite my Scrooge-like gripes it is funny in parts and garnered a standing ovation. Perhaps I’m being too grumpy. Perhaps I need a lesson. Perhaps I need to be visited by ghostly critics of plays Past, Present and Future to help me mend my ways…

Reviewer: Peter Kinnock

Reviewed: 20th November 2024

North West End UK Rating:

Rating: 3 out of 5.
0Shares